Comments on: Prince Harry http://www.alukeonlife.com/2008/02/29/prince-harry/ Mon, 02 Jan 2012 22:42:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Ruthie http://www.alukeonlife.com/2008/02/29/prince-harry/comment-page-1/#comment-22954 Ruthie Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:04:41 +0000 http://www.alukeonlife.com/2008/02/29/prince-harry/#comment-22954 I think they were right, according to the Beeb it was voluntary - so no sensorship. And surely when you realise that it would in no way endanger someone by telling the story, but it could endanger loads by releasing it yuo can't argue against it. They have not been constricted in what they say - just when, and even that was not forced on them, as i'm sure rumours would have been abound if it was. I say well done to the press for actually taking people into consideration for once. I think they were right, according to the Beeb it was voluntary – so no sensorship. And surely when you realise that it would in no way endanger someone by telling the story, but it could endanger loads by releasing it yuo can’t argue against it.

They have not been constricted in what they say – just when, and even that was not forced on them, as i’m sure rumours would have been abound if it was.

I say well done to the press for actually taking people into consideration for once.

]]>